tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35921470.post8137459021589932667..comments2023-07-16T06:34:24.888-04:00Comments on Tales Of Two Cities: An Expanded Symphony Woodswordboneshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00250201271555676642noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35921470.post-85004627994237276752008-08-01T02:24:00.000-04:002008-08-01T02:24:00.000-04:00Your 7/19 post includes what you describe as the "...Your 7/19 post includes what you describe as the "most informative graphic and detailed plan from the GGP Draft Master Plan". That graphic shows a road bridge over Lake Kittamaqundi (but doesn't show how it intersects with Route 29 or where it goes east of that). The GGP graphic you have included in this 7/31 post, however, shows absolutely no road bridge over Lake Kittamaqundi at that same location. Your 4/29 post's GGP graphic also doesn't show a road going over the lake in that location. So which graphic is accurate and which is misleading?<BR/><BR/>Back to your post's topic, for the sake of clarity:<BR/>- how many acres is Symphony Woods currently?<BR/>- how many acres of it would be consumed by new road construction?<BR/>- how many acres of it would be consumed by new building construction?<BR/>- how many of the adjacent acres shown as park in this "after" illustration are non-buildable anyway since they are protected already either because they are wetlands, adjacent to streams, or are necessary to retain for onsite forest retention requirements?<BR/>- how many acres of GGP property adjacent to Symphony Woods are you saying will "expand" Symphony Woods?<BR/>- will those acres of GGP property that the illustration shows as natural areas be deeded to the County or CA?<BR/>With those questions answered, we can then understand if there is really a net expansion of Symphony Woods.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com